About Me

Name: daddontsk8
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Another reason why the Government should NOT run our schools

My 6th grader attends a government-run middle school in the Garland, (Texas) Independent School District.  He is at home this week with the swine H1N1 flu, so I’ve been collecting his assignments from his teachers and to complete at home.  One of those assignments was to compare the Magna Carta to the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution.  As I was helping my son complete the work, my gaze was drawn to the government-approved version of Amendment 2.
We can get permission to own weapons to protect ourselves.
We immediately had a lesson on the Second Amendment, as I explained the word permission was no where to be found in the Second Amendment and how the reason for the amendment was to spell out our right to have the means to overthrow a tyrannical government.

Click through for more...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear Mr. President, A Modest Proposal

 

Why does Health Care Reform need to be so hard and so complex? And why is it that the best the Democratic leadership can come up with is to overlay a government-run solution on top of our current, flawed health care system?

There are several areas of our health care system that are not functioning properly as you’ve noted in your speeches, press conferences and town hall meetings.

Choice. Our current health insurance system does not give individual Americans true choice. Many of us with employer-based health insurance are lucky to have more than one option through our employer. So the plan you support offers us a second choice, but not really, because the choice will still rest with our employers. Why not free up the market by allowing individuals to have real choice?

  1. Change the tax laws to remove the benefit employers have of providing health insurance to employees and instead let the tax benefit go to the individual.
  2. Allow for more competition by removing the barriers an individual has to buying a policy across state lines.

Affordability. For many Americans health insurance is not affordable.

  1. The change in tax law I mentioned earlier could go a long way to solve the problem. Make the tax benefit a tax credit, and everyone will have money to put toward a health insurance plan.
  2. Provide direct subsidies to the poor to purchase health insurance in lieu of tax credits.
  3. Expand group insurance to include associations, so more people have access to insurance at lower group rates.
  4. Remove coverage mandates, so insurance companies can develop less comprehensive and less expensive policies.
  5. Provide money to the states to help create and fund high risk pools for those who are priced out of the health insurance market due to pre-existing conditions.
  6. Expand Health Savings Accounts by increasing the cap an individual can save in a year.

Portability. The entrepreneurial spirit of Americans and the free flow of labor are often crushed by the weight of health insurance premiums. Losing a job means the loss of health insurance for many.

  1. Changing the tax law to focus on the individual would help solve the problem of portability as the individual would not lose the tax benefit to become an entrepreneur.
  2. Allowing associations to offer group policies would allow individuals to switch jobs without the concern of losing their health benefit.

Access. The ability to find a doctor is especially problematic for Medicaid patients and rural and inner-city residents. Encourage local governments to find solutions to these problems at the local level

  1. Perhaps the establishment of city or charity-sponsored health clinics.
  2. Provide tax benefits or education subsidies for health care professionals to provide services to these areas.

Cost. Not only is health insurance becoming less and less affordable, but as more people are unable to afford health insurance, the cost of care is rising. Tort reform is essential to lowering the cost of health care.

  1. Something as simple as removing or reducing the lure of punitive damages from medical malpractice suits would do the trick.
  2. If punishment of malicious behavior is the goal, let the states give their licensing boards more authority to fine the malevolent provider.

Health Education and Nutrition. You have often said that education about healthy lifestyles will reduce costs over time. There are a number of ways to encourage healthy behaviors. The legislation being considered has both punitive and positive measures. I’ve come up with two ideas that are not included in the legislation. I am certain in the vast wealth of talent our citizens possess, there are many more ways to accomplish this goal, and with better and quicker results than what I am suggesting.

  1. Support efforts at the local and state level to educate people about healthy behaviors and healthy choices.
  2. Make healthy nutritional options more affordable by removing agricultural subsidies, encouraging farmers and ranchers to diversify into other food crops and livestock, resulting in more and more affordable options for the consumer.

I haven’t submitted these ideas to the Congressional Budget Office to determine the impact to the federal budget, but I would guess the impact is either revenue neutral or perhaps even adds revenue to the coffers. As a nation we seem to be caught up in the weeds of this debate. Now more than ever we need leadership to address the six issues outlined above. As I read the bills coming out of the House Committees, the only one of these areas being addressed adequately is sufficiently is portability. Perhaps we should step back just a moment, as a nation, and assess whether the health care reform legislation is truly reformative.

Thank you for all your work to make our nation a better place.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Moving in the Right Direction

The State of Arizona is out of money. They are so out of money, they don't have any more financial gimmicks to use to close the state's budget deficit. So, according to The Arizona Republic, the state legislature wants to sell some of the state's properties. The plan includes selling the buildings, but then leasing them back.

"In total, the list comprises 32 properties that, if built from the ground up,
come with a combined replacement value in excess of $1 billion.

The properties were chosen based on attractiveness to investors, buildings the state
would be unlikely to walk away from, such as prisons or other facilities that
provide essential government services"
The government would then use the proceeds for the sale to fund general operations. This is not unlike a family taking a mortgage on their home to buy groceries.

But...I think Arizona might just be on the right track. [More]
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The marijuana Wars - California versus the Feds?

The State of California is the epicenter of the battle between state sovereignty and federal authority, but I think something else is going on here. In the "publicly announced" War on Drugs, the citizens of Oakland, California legitimized the business of selling marijuana through the passage of a measure to tax weed. Yesterday a conglomeration of federal agencies and local and state vassal authorities launched a crackdown on marijuana growers in the Fresno, California area. Operation SOS netted plants valued at $1.2 billion.

Are the federal authorities challenging the will of the people or the sovereignty of the state? Or is something else afoot?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Representative Democracy in a Small City

There are two types of elected representation that most effectively will represent citizens in a representative democracy. One method is the American system of single-member districts. The other is proportional representation systems common in Europe. A third type which takes the worst of both systems, is a system of multi-member or at-large districts. The City of Rowlett, Texas has this type of system.

So you might be asking why this type of system is so bad. Let me try to explain through recent history:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Detroit Schools On the Verge of Rennaissance?

In an article in the Wall Street Journal entitled, Detroit Schools on the Brink, the specter of financial bankruptcy is unleashed. The article describes worried parents, how only one in four students that start high school in the district graduate in four years, and how the bankruptcy could hinder the school district's ability to float bonds.

With 100 empty schools, the district doesn't need to float bonds, it needs to sell assets.

That aside, the real opportunity for the Detroit Public School System is the bankruptcy.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Those Crazy Republicans

The Washington Post has a fine piece of journalism in their paper this morning.  Columnist Dana Milbank took up space in the paper to report on the fact that the Republican National Committee developed a communication strategy and then ACTED on it.

Mr. Milbank went through an RNC strategy memo and demonstrated how RNC Chairman Michael Steele delivered a speech using the language recommended by that strategy memo. 

It's crazy...having a plan and sticking to it. Crazy!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Public Doesn't Want Its Benefits Taxed

I had the opportunity to work on a quick opinion poll about taxation of dental benefits. Our survey is one of several public opinion polls trying to understand the impact of taxation on health benefits. Compared to other surveys published in the same time frame, around July 4th, our survey was not as strong as other surveys in terms of public distaste for having their health benefits taxed.

Read more here

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the Health Care Reform debate what happens to your dental benefits?

The current "Tri-Committee" bill that is currently in the mark-up phase in the various House committees has a provision that mandates coverage in a "qualified health plan." The qualified health plan is required in the current language of the bill to include minimum prentive health benefits AND oral and vision care benefits for children. The current language, which is unlikely to be changed prior to being introduced in the House, would require the dental and vision benefit to be offered as part of a comprehensive health plan.  Most dental benefits in this country are offered as stand-alone plans with a premium separate from that of the medical premium.  The House language will effectively eliminate stand-alone dental and vision plans in the marketplace.

So, if enacted as written, the Health Care Reform legislation will so alter the dental insurance market to effectively destroy it. Discount dental and vision plans would not even be allowed in the definitioin of a "qualified health care plan."

BTW, children, for the purposes of this bill includes all dependents aged 21 and younger.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The War on Drugs - A States' Rights Issue

Calif tax officials: Legal pot would rake in $1.4B

Follow the money! There's money in pot. This California proposal could generate a lot of money. It is this tax revenue that will provide the momentum for the legalization of pot. The states in the direst of financial situations; California, Washington, Oregon, New York, Michigan, and maybe Florida, will be the first to legalize. But the federal government will balk.

Could drug legalization become the next states' rights fight?

The motivations for the two parties is in direct conflict.
Read more...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why can't we learn from the past? Why Health Care Reform is doomed to fail

There is one question that the Health Care Reform debate fails to bring up – what will happen when EVERYONE has health insurance?  Simple economics would suggest that prices for medical care will go up dramatically as more people seek out medical services.

But we all know that the engineers of Health Care Reform will not let prices increase.  The crafters of HCR will impose price controls on medical services through reimbursement rates. So what happens when demand (and price pressures) go up, but supply remains unchanged?

We only have to look at the gas shortages of the 1970s to predict what will happen to health care.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Look what's happening in Texas

Reposted from my main blog:
According to the Dallas Morning News, "Schools get credit for kids predicted to pass TAKS."
From my perspective, this is just further evidence that the public school system isn't really for the benefit of the public or for educating.

I mean no offense to teachers everywhere by my disgust for government-run education. There are wonderful teachers and there are good schools within the system, but there are also bad teachers and outright dangerous schools. My disgust is with the system that stifles creativity, discourages many, and teaches in a uniform manner that leaves the challenged kids behind, and leads the exceptional to boredom.

Government-run schools exist for one purpose, their own survival. So I guess it shouldn't suprise me that they will be pulling the wool over the people's eyes, but it sure makes me angry.

I don't know why it is so hard to create a system where education dollars can follow the kids. Let the schools compete for those dollars based on the merits of the school, the quality of the teachers and the results achieved by the kids. If I thought there was enough outrage in my district to do something about this I would run for office, but I fear that most parents just want to live in blissful ignorance and not rock the boat.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Boys will be Boys

A quote from Bill Clinton about Fred Thompson via Real Clear Politics

"I have an interesting relationship with Fred Thompson. When he was Senator from Tennessee I used to send him cigars."

Tears came to my eyes from laughing so hard.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Richard Cohen is an Idiot

Who the hell is Richard Cohen? He is a columnist in the Op/Ed section of the Washington Post. And he is an idiot. In a piece published today, Giuliani’s JFK Moment, he presents the argument that a person’s religion should not have an impact on his or her qualification for president. Wrong, wrong, wrong!


Every man and woman has a religion. That religion may be Catholicism, Islam, Wiccan, or even Atheism. It may be self, some concept of a Utopian society or a set of rules or values by which to live. Religion is basically the practices and beliefs that bind man to his god. A person’s god is the thing he worships. The thing he worships is what he devotes his time and treasure toward. To discover the religion of any man or woman, understand what is important to them. Is it power, financial security, family, preservation of a series of rites and rituals, music in church, drugs, and this list is only limited by the number of people to ever exist.


So as Mr. Cohen argues that a man’s religion is not relevant to his ability to be the leader of this country, he goes on to describe how a schizophrenic president will then benefit the guiding principles of his own religion - rationalism, ending the war in Iraq, and homosexual marriage. For a man that worships rationalism, he is most certainly being very irrational. Man cannot be separated from his religion without a tremendous amount of upheaval, angst, and violence. So to take Mr. Cohen’s position is to deny a fundamental truth about the mind and spirit of man. Rather than ignore the religion of the presidential candidates, we should seek to understand them. Because by understanding the religion of the candidates we can begin to understand the kinds of decisions they will make. Mr. Cohen sees in Mr. Giuliani for what he is, a rationalist and a secularist; and this agrees with Mr. Cohen’s religion.



This posting and more like it can be found at The CommonMan Commentaries.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Army of God?

I just ran across a very disturbing bit of news. According to Max Blumenthal at TheNation.com, the Pentagon, through its America Supports You program, is promoting a video game based on the Left Behind series of books by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins called Left Behind: Eternal Forces to its troops. If this is true, the Pentagon and the Bush administration are making a huge mistake.


Citizens become soldiers for a variety of reasons. Some choose to enlist for economic reasons or as an expression of patriotism. Some will enlist to be a part of something larger than themselves, others to find direction and meaning for their lives, or the desire for adventure may be the driving influence. Whatever the case, the soldier, airman, seaman or marine had enough motivation to join the military, but the Pentagon is trying to bolster that motivation by adding a religious cause to the case. I have no problem with the military trying to bolster troop morale, but the use of a video game that promotes a message of religious message equivalent to the Islamic fascists they are fighting will likely have the opposite effect.


Apparently the video game in question operates on the premise of the Christian soldier fighting a physical battle against the forces of Antichrist, the UN. The moral of the game is that the U.S. military is on the side of God. The brand of Christianity that this game is promoting is really no different than the fundamentalist Muslim faction that are trying to take hold in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan and Afghanistan. By promoting one view of God over another, it won't take long for the troops in the field to ask themselves, "If I am fighting for God and my enemy is fighting for God, then why are we fighting each other?" The only justification for continuing to fight is an absurdity; God likes my country and my people better - or - our side is more righteous in the eyes of God. Eventually, any thinking soldier will understand the absurdity of the message being promoted through this arm of the Pentagon and will have a demoralizing effect on our forces.



This posting and more like it can be found at The CommonMan Commentaries

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »